The Court granted unconditional leave to the Defendant to file a belated written statement due to inadvertence and held the Notice of Motion absolute in terms of prayers.
Notice of Motion made absolute; leave granted to file written statement belatedly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2988 OF 2006
IN
SUIT NO.2828 OF 1998
Mrs.Prabha P. Shenai....Plaintiff
V/s.
Ispat Metallic India Ltd.....Defendant
Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir i/b Mr.T.N. Tripathi for the
Plaintiff.
Mr.Sandeep Parikh i/b Mr.Raj Baid for the Defendant in
support.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J . DATED : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2006.
P.C. :
1.Unconditional leave was obtained by the
Defendant on 22.2.2000. The Defendant was granted two
months time to file the written statement. The
written statement was in fact served on the Plaintiff
on 5.3.2001 though after the period of two months.
Through inadvertence it remained to be filed.
2.In the circumstances, the Notice of Motion is
made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b).
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court