High Court dismissed a notice of motion and restored the Income Tax Appeal no. 91 of 2002 to the file.
Motion dismissed; appeal restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 631 OF 2003 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 91 OF 2002.
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-V..
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s Sanghvi Construction P.Ltd... Respondents.
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistry for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED : 13.6 .2006.
P.C. :
. For the reasons stated therein, Motion is
allowed. Appeal is restored to file. No order as
to costs.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-V
M/s Sanghvi Construction P.Ltd
V.C.DAGA
J.P.DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
