The Commissioner of Income-Tax,Bombay. v. M/S Honey Diamonds
Bombay HCITXA/261/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether the Tribunal was correct in law in allowing the appeal of the assessee and setting aside the order of the assessing officer regarding interest earned on fixed deposits.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶2
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.261 OF 2004
¶4
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
¶5
V/s.
¶6
M/s.Honey Diamonds ..Respondent.
¶7
Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.Prashan Uchil for appellant.
¶8
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
¶9
DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006.
¶10
P.C. :-
¶11
. Heard. Admit on the following substantial
¶12
question of law:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the Tribunal was correct in law in allowing the appeal of the assessee and setting aside the order of the assessing officer regarding interest earned on fixed deposits.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
The Commissioner of Income-tax
- respondent
M/s. Honey Diamonds
Coram
AI extract
V.C. DAGA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court