Notice of Motion disposed of because a previous oral application for stay, rejected on April 19, 2006, was not accompanied by a filed Notice of Motion at that time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1837 OF 2006
IN
APPEAL NO.213 OF 2006
IN
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 13 OF 2004
S.R.Khanna .. Appellant
Vs.
Pradeep R. Mafatlal & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.S.R.Khanna for the Appellant.
Mr.D.J.Khambhata, Senior Advocate i/b. Thakkar &
Co. for the Respondents.
-----
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ.
DATE : 26TH JULY,2006.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. We
have perused our order dated 19th April, 2006. We
make it clear that on the said date, only an oral
application was made for stay, which was rejected by
us at that stage and that no Notice of Motion was
taken out, at that time. Accordingly, this Notice of
Motion stands disposed of.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
:2:
(S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)
S.R.Khanna
Pradeep R. Mafatlal & Ors.
DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
S.J.VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court