Disposed
The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Geeta Udyog and Anr.
Bombay HCNMA/1249/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION No.1249 of 2006 IN APPEAL No. 1014 of 1998 IN SUIT No. 298 of 1983. The Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co.Ltd. ... Appellants.
Versus.
Geeta Udyog & Anr. ... Respondents.
Mr. M.P.S. Rao i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for the appellant.
Mr. Soumya Srikrishna,Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 25/04/2006. Mentioned Not on Board.
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused
the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion.
For the reasons stated therein,sufficient cause is
made out for restoration of the appeal No.1014 of
1998 on file. There is no case of inaction,
negligence of want of bonafide on the part of the
appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute
in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(S.J. VAZIFDAR,J)
The Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Geeta Udyog & Anr.
D.Radhakrishnan
S.J.Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court