Allowed

The Commissioner of Walth-Tax v. Reliance Comsolidated Enterprises Ltd.

Bombay HC6 Oct 2006NMA/1071/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, on a notice of motion, cononed a delay of 20 days in filing two Wealth Tax Appeals. The court granted the applications, numbered the appeals, and listed them for hearing on a specified date before disposing of the motions.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 20 days condoned; Appeals numbered; Listed for hearing on 17th October 2006; Motions granted.

The Commissioner of Walth-Tax Vs Reliance Comsolidated Enterprises Ltd. — Bombay HC (2006) — LawSathi Research

¶1

-1-

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 O.O.C.J.

¶3

 Notice of Motion No.1071 of 2003
 In

¶4

 Wealth Tax Appeal (L) No.293 of 2003

¶5

 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax-3 .. Applicant
 v/s.
 M/s.Reliance Consolidated
 Enterprises Ltd. .. .. Respondent
 Mr.A.N.Kotangale i/by Mr.K.B.Rao for applicant.

¶6

 -----

¶7

 W I T H

¶8

 Notice of Motion No.1072 of 2004
 In

¶9

 Wealth Tax Appeal (L) No.294 of 2003

¶10

 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax-3 .. Applicant
 v/s.
 M/s.Rishiraj Merchandise (P) Ltd. .. Respondent

¶11

 Mr.A.N.Kotangale i/by Mr.A.B.Rao for applicant.
 Mr.J.D.Mistri with Mr.Raj Darak for respondent.

¶12

 -----

¶13

CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.

¶14

DATED : 6th October 2006
P.C. :

¶15

 1. Both these Motions seek condonation of

¶16

 delay of 20 days in filing Wealth Tax Appeal
 (Lodging) Nos.293 of 2003 and 294 of 2003.

¶17

 2. Heard Mr.Kontalgale in support of these
 Motions. Mr.Mistri appearing for the respondent
 leaves it to the Court to pass appropriate orders.
 Delay is, therefore condoned in both the

¶18

-2-

¶19

 matters. Both the Motions are granted in terms of
 prayer (a). Both the Appeals be numbered and be

¶20

 listed on 17th October 2006.

¶21

 3. Both the Motions disposed of.

¶22

(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)

¶23

 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

The Commissioner of Walth-Tax v. Reliance Comsolidated Enterprises Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Walth-Tax v. Reliance Comsolidated Enterprises Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. J. Abdul Kalam Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

mahendra prasad tiwari Vs the state of maharastra and 7 Ors.

Dayalal Tejraj Jain Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.

M/S. Nirlon Ltd. Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

Dhananjay Prabhakar Avasarikar Vs Progressive Education Society

Sundaram Finance Ltd.and Anr. Vs State of Mah.and Ors.