to him, ought to have been given to him if he was to
join back in the College. The College Management wrote
to him by their letter dated 9/3/2006 that when he was
terminated he had not completed three years to be
confirmed and, therefore, he will have to join on the
starting pay of Rs.8,000/-. The Petitioner’s
contention is that he was denied the back wages but
otherwise, the order passed by the Division Bench in
Writ Petition No.426 of 2000 was left un disturbed by
the Supreme Court. That order read with the order
passed in the earlier Writ Petition No.4137 of 2000
made it clear that the petitioner was entitled to the
said post of Lecturer to which he was selected way back
in the year 1997. He was wrongfully terminated in
spite of having the qualification and, therefore, he
filed the first Writ Petition No.4137 of 2000 where the
High Court held that (a) Grievance Committee will
decide his representation and (b) if University decides
in his favour, he will be entitled to the said post.
Unfortunately for him, though the Grievance Committee
decided in his favour, the Management Council of
University decided against him. He was, therefore,
required to file the second Writ Petition No.426 of
2002 where the decision of the Management Council was
set aside. The petitioner had obviously joined another
college in the meanwhile and had been drawing better
