In Central Excise Appeal No. 70 of 2006, the Bombay High Court held no substantial question of law was involved and dismissed the appeal in limine with no order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2006.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane- I, ... Appellant. V/s. M/s Bayer Crop Science LKtd. ... Respondents.
Mr.Rajiv Chavan for the appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8.6.2006.
P.C. :
. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.
. No substantial question of law is involved
in the present appeal. Appeal is, therefore,
dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane- I
M/s Bayer Crop Science LKtd
V.C.DAGA
J.P.DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
