Madhukar Dadu Bhosale v. Sharad Shrikant Nalavde and Ors.
Bombay HCFA/808/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶2
FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 779 OF 2006.
¶3
Madhukar Dadu Bhosale. ... Appellant.
Versus.
¶4
Sharad Shrikant Nalavade and others. ... Respondents.
¶5
Shri N.M.Kulkarni i/by Shri Ashutosh M.Kulkarni for the
Appellant.
¶6
Shri Himanshu Thanawala for the Respondent No.2.
¶7
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 24th MARCH, 2006.
P.C.:
¶8
1. Admit. Respondent No.2 waives service. Hearing
¶9
expedited.
¶10
2. Time of six weeks is granted to remove office
objections in the First Appeal. If office objections
are not removed within stipulated time, the Appeal will
stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
¶11
3. Printing is dispensed with. The Appellant is
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Madhukar Dadu Bhosale
- respondent
Sharad Shrikant Nalavade
Coram
AI extract
Abhay S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court