The High Court of Bombay extended time for deposit of amount in two civil applications due to reasons provided in the applications and lack of compliance with earlier interim orders.
Rules were made absolute in terms of the prayer clauses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.485 OF 1992,
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.957 OF 2006
IN
FIRSTAPPEAL NO.1032 OF 1991
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATED: MARCH 23, 2006.
P.C.:
1.Heard learned A.G.P. for the
Appellant. None appears for the
Respondent. No compliance is made with
ad-interim order dated 18th February
1992. Civil Application No.957 of 2006
is filed for seeking extension of time to
deposit the amount.
2. In view of the reasons set out in the
Application, time deserves to be extended.
3.Civil Applications are disposed of
by following order :
C.A.No.957/2006
-2-
. Rule is made absolute in terms of
prayer clauses (a) and (b).
C.A.No.485 of 1992
. Rule is made absolute in terms of
ad-interim order dated 18th February 1992.
Judge.
Appellant
Respondent
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court