Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Shashikant Ambrushi Kade

Bombay HC4 Aug 2006FA/2408/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted six weeks to remove office objections and admitted the appeal without printing, directing the filing of a private paper book within one year on pain of dismissal for want of prosecution.

What did the court decide?

Six weeks to remove objections; appeal admitted without printing; private paper book to be filed within one year for want of prosecution if not filed; notice by Registered/Speed Post and hand delivery

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Shashikant… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

-1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶3

FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.1892 OF 2005

¶4

 .............................................................
 Office Notes,Office

¶5

 memorandum of Coram,

¶6

 appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
 orders or directionsJudge’s orders
 & Registrar’s orders.

¶7

 .............................................................
Mr.A.R.Patil,A.G.P. for State

¶8

CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATED: AUGUST 4, 2006.

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. Time of six weeks is granted to remove
office objections. If objections are not
removed within stipulated period, Appeal
will stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without reference to the
Court.

¶11

2. Admit. Printing is dispensed with.
The Appellant is directed to file private
paper book along with sufficient number of
copies thereof within a period of one year
from today. If the paper book is not
filed within stipulated period, the Appeal
will stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without further reference to
the Court.

¶12

-2-

¶13

3. In addition to service through Court,
the Advocate for the Appellant is directed
to serve private notice to the Respondent
by Registered Post A.D. and/or Speed Post
A.D. and/or by hand delivery. Hamdust
allowed.

¶14

Judge.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Shashikant Ambrushi Kade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Shashikant Ambrushi Kade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra S. Dighe Vs the Court Receiver and Anr.

Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika and Anr. Vs Life Insurance Corporation of India

Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika and Anr. Vs Life Insurance Corporation of India

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Shashikant Ambrushi Kade

Smt. G.D. Sohal and Anr. Vs Smt. S.V. Navalkar

M/S Kavita Poultry Farm Thr Smt Kavita K Rao(Proprietor) Vs Ramesh Manohar Talathi(Prop Gayatri Traders)