The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed an excise appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against a Tribunal decision. Finding no error of law in the Tribunal's order, the court held that no substantial question of law arose.
Excise appeal was dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.9 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Daman Commissionerate, Vapi.
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s.Aarti Industries Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Jetley i/by Dr.T.C.Kaushik for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2006.
P.C.
Heard Mr.P.S.Jetley, the learned counsel for the revenue.
Excise appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Daman Commissionerate, Vapi
M/s.Aarti Industries Ltd.
R.M. LODHA
J.P.DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
