The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard the Commissioner of Central Excise Thane-II's appeal against a Tribunal order. Finding no substantial question of law arose as the decision relied upon was not challenged, the appeal was dismissed in limine.
Appeal dismissed in limine due to no substantial question of law arising.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.10 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Central Excise Thane-II.. Appellant v/s. M/s.Angadpal Ind.P.Ltd. .. Respondent
.. Respondent
Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/by Dr.T.C.Kaushik for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2006.
P.C.
Heard Ms.S.V.Bharucha, the learned counsel for the appellant.
2
aspect.
Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Karmyogi Dyeing Pvt.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-VI, 2001(136) E.L.T.639Referred¶01
Karmyogi Dyeing Pvt.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-VI, 2001(136) E.L.T.639
Board's circular No.485/51/99 dated 15.9.1999Referred¶01
The Commissioner of Central Excise Thane-II
M/s. Angadpal Ind. Ltd.
R.M. LODHA
J.P. DEVAHDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
