This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 987 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4112 OF 1995
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of of Coram, appearances, Court’s
orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Balasaheb Badal for the petitioner.
CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J.
DATED: 20TH APRIL, 2006
Mentioned. Not on board.
P.C.:
1. Heard.
2. Since the matter is of technical in
nature, there is no need to issue notice to
the other side though they are said to be
served.
3. The order was passed in the application
on 7.4.2006 granting it in terms of prayer
clauses (a) & (b), however, it should be in
terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) & (d).
Hence, the application is made absolute in
terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) & (d) and
stands disposed of.
Petitioner
P.V. KAKADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court