Disposed
Sunanda Arvind Kutwal and Anr. v. Sankanta Prasad Sharma
Bombay HCCAW/1196/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1196 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 291 OF 2005
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of of Coram, appearances, Court’s
orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Girin N. Pandit for the petitioners.
Mr. V.Y. Sanglikar for the respondent.
CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J.
DATED: 20TH APRIL, 2006
P.C.:
1. Heard both sides.
2. In view of the facts and circumstances,
the application is made absolute in terms
of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and stands
disposed of with no order as to costs.
Restored petition to be placed in the
category of senior citizen as per the
chronoligical order.
P.V. KAKADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court