The Bombay High Court rejected the applicant's civil application seeking two months' time to deposit Rs. 2 lacs, as the applicant is in no position to pay and the case lacks bona fides. Disposition: Rejected.
Application for extension of time to deposit Rs. 2 lacs within two months is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 852 OF 2006. IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7809
OF 2005 .
Avinash D. Ohal ... Applicant. V/s. Nivruti Balaji Davkhare ... Respondents.
Smt.S.A.Dhame for the applicant.
Shri S.R.Page for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J.
DATED : 18.3.2006.
P.C. : ---- .
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.
The applicant has not deposited the amount
| as ordered |
by |
this |
Court | vide |
order | dated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.12.2005. | ON | being | asked, | le | arned | Cou | nsel | for | the |
| applicant | submits | that | the | applic | ant is |
not | even | in | |
| a position |
to pay |
Rs. | 2 | lacs | within | 2 | weeks | tim | e . |
| He seeks |
two | months’ | time | to | deposit | Rs. | 2 | lacs. | |
| Considering | the | absence | of | bona | fides, | this | is | not | a |
fit case to grant extension of time. Application is
therefore, rejected.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves an extension of time to deposit the amount ordered. [53 characters]
Whether the applicant has the financial position to deposit the ordered amount within the stipulated time.
Avinash D. Ohal
Nivruti Balaji Davkhare
V.C.Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
