Disposed
Manikchand Motilal Kataria and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
Bombay HCCAW/282/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
C.A. NO. 282 OF 2006
WITH
C.A. 283 of 2006
WITH
C.A. NO. 3092 of 2004
WITH
C.A. 3093 OF 2004
WITH
C.A. No. 3095 of 2004
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2948 OF 2004
Manikchand Motilal Kataria and
anr. ... Applicants
Versus
Union of India and anr. ... Respondents
Mr. D.J. Bange for Petitioner.
Mr. P.H. Joshi for R. No. 2.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 03, 2006
P.C.
. Considering that the Petition itself is disposed
of, nothing survives in these applications. It
will be open to the Petitioner, if any relief
sought for in these applications are available, to
seek such remedy in the appeal which they may
prefer. With the above observations, Applications
disposed of.
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
2
(DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
Manikchand Motilal Kataria
Union of India
F.I. REBELLO
D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court