Dismissed
S.G. Bawane v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCRPW/9/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
REVIEW PETITION NO.9 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9736 OF 2003
Dr. S.G. Bawane. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
.... None for the Petitioner. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.6 & 7.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
.
P.C.
None present for the Review Petitioner when the matter
was called out. Even otherwise, we do not find any error of law apparent on the face of the record in the impugned order warranting interference in the exercise of our jurisdiction and as
such no interference is called for. The Review Petition is dismissed.
( F.I. Rebello, J.)
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Dr. S.G. Bawane
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
F.I. Rebello
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court