Single judge order allowing a civil application for condoning delay in filing a review petition. Disposition recorded in the memo of the application.
Civil application allowed for condoning delay in filing review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2524 OF 2006
IN
REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 1869 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5449 OF 2004
1. The Conservator of Forest, Pune & anr.
... Applicant
V/s
Shri Shivaji Kerbhau Nimase
... Respondent
Mr. S.K. Chinchalikar, Govt. Pleader for the applicant.
Mr. Prashant Jadhav i/by S.D. Patil for the respondent.
CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.
DATED: 17TH NOVEMBER, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Heard parties.
2. The civil application has been filed for condoning
the delay in filing the review petition against the
order dated 6th July, 2004. There is a delay of 528
days. This delay according to the petitioner is
explained in the civil application.
3. Civil application allowed for the reasons mentioned
in the memo of the civil application.
2
bsb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 528 days in filing the review petition should be condoned.
The Conservator of Forest, Pune & anr.
Shri Shivaji Kerbhau Nimase
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court