The court disposed of the civil application as both parties consented to proceed finally on the main revision application instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 OF 2006
IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2006
Prakash Ramchandra Rajguru ...Applicant Versus Deepak Gangabhishandas Bajaj & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.N.M.Godbole for Applicant. Mr.P.S.Dani for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 24, 2006. P.C. 1. This Application is disposed of as both parties agree that the main Revision Application can be proceeded finally today itself on the basis of argument that would be relevant for this Application. 2. Accordingly, no orders are necessary on this Application. Instead, Revision Application is
: 2 :
taken on board and finally heard forthwith, by
consent.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Prakash Ramchandra Rajguru
Deepak Gangabhishandas Bajaj
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
