The Bombay High Court granted a civil application ex parte due to the non-appearance of respondents willing to counter its assertions. The application was disposed of as prayed in clause (i).
The application is granted in terms of prayer clause (i).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1328 OF 1992
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4581 OF 1991
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.30 OF 1992
Shivprasad B. Gurav & Ors. ..Applicants.
V/s.
Chairman, Pacchim Maharashtra Devasthan
Vyavasthapan Samiti, Kolhapur & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.A.V.Bandivadekar for applicants.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : APRIL 21, 2006.
P.C. :
1. Inspite of service, none appears for the
respondents. No reply has been filed to counter the
assertions made in the application. For the reasons
mentioned in the application, the application is
granted in terms of prayer clause (i).
Shivprasad B. Gurav
Chairman, Pacchim Maharashtra Devasthan Vyavasthapan Samiti, Kolhapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court