Dismissed

Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC13 Feb 2006APPW/30/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment consists of four short orders (Crim. App. Nos. 30, 56, 57, 75, 76 of 2006) dismissing applications for modification of prior orders. The High Court granted extensions of time for approaching the Sessions Court, subject to the condition that any revision filed must explain the delay.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time granted for approaching the Sessions Court, subject to explanation of delay in any subsequent revision.

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

:1:

¶2

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2006 IN CRI.W.P.NO.1308/2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s
 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mr. Prakash Naik for the Petitioner.
 Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP. for the State.

¶4

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 13/2/2006.

¶5

 P.C.
 1. This is an application for
 modification of order dated 6.12.2005
 passed by this court. Extension of
 time is sought for approaching the
 Sessions Court. With the clarification
 that if and when the revision
 application is filed, the delay will
 have to be explained by the applicants,
 subject to observations made by this
 court in order dated 6.12.2005.
 Application is accordingly, disposed
 off.

¶6

:2:

¶7

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

¶8

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶9

 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.56 OF 2006 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.7874/2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s
 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.

¶10

 Mr. Prakash Naik for the Petitioner.
 Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP. for the State.

¶11

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 13/2/2006.

¶12

 P.C.
 1. This is an application for
 modification of order dated 12.12.2005
 passed by this court. Extension of
 time is sought for approaching the
 Sessions Court. With the clarification
 that if and when the revision
 application is filed, the delay will
 have to be explained by the applicants,
 subject to observations made by this
 court in order dated 12.12.2005.
 Application is accordingly, disposed
 off.

¶13

:3:

¶14

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

¶15

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶17

 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.57 OF 2006 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.7945/2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s

¶18

 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.

¶19

 Mr. Prakash Naik for the Petitioner.
 Mr.D.R.More, APP. for the State.

¶20

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 13/2/2006.

¶21

 P.C.

¶22

 1. This is an application for
 modification of order dated 14.12.2005
 passed by this court. Extension of
 time is sought for approaching the
 Sessions Court. With the clarification
 that if and when the revision
 application is filed, the delay will
 have to be explained by the applicants,
 subject to observations made by this
 court in order dated 14.12.2005.
 Application is accordingly, disposed

¶23

:4:

¶24

 off.

¶25

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

¶26

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.75 OF 2006 IN CRI. APPLN.NO.7914/2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s
 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mr. Prakash Naik for the Petitioner.
 Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP. for the State.

¶27

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 13/2/2006.
 P.C.
 1. This is an application for
 modification of order dated 13.12.2005
 passed by this court. Extension of
 time is sought for approaching the
 Sessions Court. With the clarification
 that if and when the revision
 application is filed, the delay will
 have to be explained by the applicants,
 subject to observations made by this
 court in order dated 13.12.2005.

¶28

:5:

¶29

 Application is accordingly, disposed
 off.

¶30

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

¶31

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶33

 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2006 IN CRI.APPLN. NO.4321/2005

¶34

 Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
 of Coram, appearance, Court’s
 orders or directions and
 Registrar’s orders.

¶35

 Mr. Prakash Naik for the Petitioner.
 Ms.G.P. Mulekar, APP. for the State.

¶36

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 13/2/2006.

¶37

 P.C.

¶38

 1. This is an application for
 modification of order dated 20.12.2005
 passed by this court. Extension of
 time is sought for approaching the
 Sessions Court. With the clarification
 that if and when the revision
 application is filed, the delay will
 have to be explained by the applicants,
 subject to observations made by this

¶39

:6:

¶40

 court in order dated 20.12.2005.
 Application is accordingly, disposed
 off.

¶41

(R. S. MOHITE, J.)

Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpa Yeshwant Harare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dilip Shankarrao Banakar Vs Tarabai Bhaskar Chopade and Ors.

Yashwant Tulaji Takalkar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Narayan Nagu Yadav Vs Dyandeo Damu Kurhade and Anr.

M/S. Radan Multimedia Ltd. and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Ashok Tanaji Sorte and Ors.