The High Court of Bombay, Appellate Side, rejected an application seeking recall of an order. The bench held there was no reason to recall, allowing the petitioner to approach the respective forums and file the reply under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Application rejected summarily; petition to approach forums and file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Application No.107 of 2006
In
Criminal Writ Petition No.348 of 1999
Maitreya Vinod Doshi Vs.
Union of India & ors.
Applicant
Respondents
Mrs.R.R.Dhuru with Mr.R.C.Dhuru for applicant.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ.
July 14, 2006.
P.C.
. We have heard the learned counsel for the
| review | petitio | ner and |
we | have noted |
from the |
record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| that | the | impugned | warrant was |
issued for |
causing | |
| presence | of | the | pe |
titioner before |
the District |
and |
| State | Forums | and | to | reply to the |
show cause |
notice |
| issued | under | Sec | tion | 27 of the |
Consumer | Protection |
| Act, | 1986. | We, | therefo | re, do not |
see any reason |
to |
| recall | our | order | dated | 13/1/2006 a |
nd it is for |
the |
petitioner to approach before the respective forums
and file their reply.
. The application is rejected summarily.
(SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Maitreya Vinod Doshi
Union of India & ors.
B.H.Marlappalle
R.S.Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
