This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Application No.106 of 2006
In
Criminal Writ Petition No.1270 of 2001
Chandrakant Pranlal Shah
Applicant
Vs.
Union of India & ors.
Respondents
Mrs.R.R.Dhuru with Mr.R.C.Dhuru for applicant.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ.
July 14, 2006.
P.C.
. We have heard the learned counsel for the
| review | petitio | ner and |
we | have noted |
from the |
record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| that | the | impugned | warrant was |
issued for |
causing | |
| presence | of | the | pe |
titioner before |
the District |
and |
| State | Forums | and | to | reply to the |
show cause |
notice |
| issued | under | Sec | tion | 27 of the |
Consumer | Protection |
| Act, | 1986. | We, | therefo | re, do not |
see any reason |
to |
| recall | our | order | dated | 13/1/2006 a |
nd it is for |
the |
petitioner to approach before the respective forums
and file their reply.
. The application is rejected summarily.
(SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Chandrakant Pranlal Shah
Union of India & ors.
B.H.MARLAPALLE
SMT.R.S.DALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
