The High Court granted leave under section 378(4) CrPC, admitted the criminal appeal, and directed the office to call for the record and proceed with the appeal.
Leave granted under section 378(4) CrPC; Appeal admitted; Office to call for record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2314 OF 2004
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
.............................................................
Mr.S.G.Kudle for the Applicant
Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P. for State
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : AUGUST 22, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant.
Perused the impugned Judgment and order as
well as copy of the complaint and xerox
copy of the relevant news items. A case
for grant of leave under section 378 (4)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is
made out. Leave is granted. Appeal is
admitted. Office to call for Record and
Proceedings.
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave is required to be granted under section 378(4) CrPC for appeal against the impugned judgment and order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
State
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court