This is a criminal application deciding on the grant of leave to prefer an appeal. The Court held that a case was made out under Section 378(4) CrPC 1973. Leave to appeal is granted, appeal is admitted, and the Office is directed to call for the record.
Leave to prefer appeal is granted; appeal is admitted; office to call for record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2153 OF 2003
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
.............................................................
Mr.S.V.Kotwal i/b Mr.M.S.Mohite for the
Applicant
Mr.B.A.Vora for the Respondent No.1
Mr.A.S.Shitole, A.P.P. for State
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : AUGUST 22, 2006.
P.C.:
1. Heard Advocates for the parties. A
case for grant of leave under section 378
(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 is made out. Leave is granted to
prefer an Appeal. Appeal is admitted.
Office to call for the Record and
Proceedings.
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave for preferring an appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC 1973 is granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
Respondent No.1
State
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court