This criminal application under Section 378(3) CrPC filed by a private informant was dismissed as not maintainable because no prosecution had been instituted at the instance of the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1884 OF 2001
Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.U.V.Nikam, A.P.P. for State
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 4,2006.
P.C.:
Applicant is not maintainable. Dismissed.
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 378(3) CrPC filed by a private informant, without a specific prosecution, is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Maharashtra
Applicant
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
