The petition seeking withdrawal under Section 378(4) CrPC was dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition later.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.750 OF 2006
Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Harihar Bhave i/b M/s.Bhave & Company for the Petitioner Ms S.V.Gajare A.P.P. for State Mr.S.D.Dharmadhikari for Respondent No.2
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 3,2006.
P.C.:
| 1. | Heard learned |
Advo | cate | for the |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petitioner | and the |
learned |
Adv | ocate for |
| the Re |
spondent No.2. |
The | advocat | e for the |
| Petitioner | seeks | permission | to | withdraw |
| this | Petition with |
liberty | to | file an |
Application under section 378 (4) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Farad Continuation Sheet
State
Respondent No. 2
Ashvinok Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
