Shyam Vitthal Nimbale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court rejected bail application in rape case involving IPC 376. Court held identification parade indicates material evidence exists and offence is serious. Order is prima facie for trial court's consideration only.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; applicant not fit for bail.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1566 OF 2006
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Vikas Shivarkar for the
applicant.
Mr.R.Y.Mirza APP for the State.
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
Date : 13.6.2006.
PC
1. This is an application for
grant of bail. The applicant is
shown as an accused in
C.R.No.702/2005 registered by
Kothrud police station, Pune for
offences punishable under
Sections 341, 342,
366(A),376(G), 506 r/w 34 of
IPC. FIR is lodged at the
instance of Sarika Sudam Bhagat
who claims to be aged 15 years.
The incident of rape took place
on the night of 20.11.2005. In
her complaint, she contended
that she was taken on the motor
cycle by force by a boy namely
Sunil who was known to her and
: 2 :
his friend, whose name she later
discovered to be Kisan because
Sunil addressed him. They took
her to a lonely spot on the
motor cycle and both committed
rape on her. Later on she has
taken to another premises and
she was raped by them as well as
2 others of which one of the
person was named Bhagwan. In
the identification parade she
identified the present accused
as the person whom she has seen
at the time of the incident. My
attention was drawn to the fact
that after recording of the FIR
on 21.11.2005, another statement
of prosecutrix was recorded on
21.11.2005 in which she stated
that 5 persons had raped her.
Police have shown 5 persons as
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is fit for grant of bail given the seriousness of the rape charge and identification evidence.
Whether the prima facie appearance against the applicant justifies rejection of bail application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kisan
- respondent
State
Coram
R.S.Mohite
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court