The petitioner sought withdrawal of two writ petitions relying on a Supreme Court decision. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITON NO.8325 OF 2004
Union of India ..Petitioner.
V/s.
M/s.Nav Maharashtra Sahakari Soot
Girni Ltd. ..Respondent.
AND
WRIT PETITON NO.8562 OF 2004
Union of India ..Petitioner.
V/s.
M/s.Indira Gandhi Mahila Sahakari
Soot Girni Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with A.S.Rao i/b.Dr.T.C.
Kaushik for petitioner in both the petitions.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
. Heard Mr.R.V.Desai, senior learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner. He submits that in the
light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the
case of Commissioner of Cus. & C.Ex., Ahmedabad V/s.
Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt.Ltd. 2005(180) E.L.T. 434
(S.C.), petitioner be allowed to be withdraw the
petitions. Accordingly, both the petitions are
dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Cus. & C.Ex., Ahmedabad V/s. Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt.Ltd.Referred¶13
Commissioner of Cus. & C.Ex., Ahmedabad V/s. Kumar Cotton Mills Pvt.Ltd. 2005(180) E.L.T. 434 (S.C.)
Union of India
M/s.Nav Maharashtra Sahakari Soot Girni Ltd.
M/s.Indira Gandhi Mahila Sahakari Soot Girni Ltd.
V.C. DAGA
J.P.D EVA DHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court