The petition was allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner as they intended to file a private complaint, thereby disposing of the criminal writ petition.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.673 OF 2005
------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s Orders
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.A.A.Mirza for petitioner
Mr.I.S.Thakur, APP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
Mr.Subodh Desai i/b R.M.G.Law for Respondent
Nos. 4, 5 and 6
Ms.H.Salian for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKER &
P.V.KAKADE, JJ.
DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2005
P.C.
. The learned Advocate for the petitioner
states that the petitioner would file private
complaint against the Respondents as well as
the Officers involved in the matter and
therefore, craves leave to withdraw the
Petition. The Petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of.
(R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.)
: 2 :
(P.V.Kakade,J.)
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
Respondent Nos. 4 to 6
Respondent No. 7
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
P.V. Kakade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court