The High Court of Bombay granted leave to withdraw the writ petition in view of a companion petition. The Industrial Court was directed to hear two specific applications together. No other substantive judgment was rendered.
Leave to withdraw petition; direction toIndustrial Court to hear ICTU Nos.1 and 4 of 2004 together.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No.3997 of 2005
Shri Sanjay B Abhyankar & ors...Petitioners
vs
Shrimal J Bhide and ors..... respondents
Mr A.D.Patwardharn for petitioner
CORAM: A.P.SHAH & D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ.
Dated 1.9.2005
P.C:
. Mentioned not on board.
. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
leave to withdraw the petition in view of the
order passed in the companion petition being Writ
Petition No.392l of 2005. Leave granted. Petition
is allowed to be withdrawn.
. The Industrial Court is directed to hear and
dispose of the Application (ICTU) No.l of 2004
alongwith Application (ICTU) No.4 of 2004.
Shri Sanjay B Abhyankar & ors
Shrimal J Bhide and ors
A.P. Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court