A writ petition filed by the Union of India against the CESTAT was declared infructuous because the Tribunal subsequently closed the appeal for orders.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 396 OF 2005 .
Union of India.
..Petitioner
V/s.
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal WZB, Mumbai. .. Respondent.
Shri P.S. Jetly with A.J. Rana, Senior Counsel for the petitioner.
Shri S.N. Kantawala i/b M/s Kantawala & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8.9.2005.
P.C. :
. We are informed that, Subsequent to the
filing of this petition, hearing of the appeal which was pending for hearing before the Tribunal has
taken place and that the Tribunal has closed it for
orders.
. In the above view of the matter, the present
petition has become infructuous. The same is
accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
Union of India
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal WZB, Mumbai
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
