The Division Bench dismissed three wealth tax appeals citing want of question of law, holding the issues were covered by a prior Division Bench judgment.
The appeals were dismissed for want of question of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 9 OF 1999.
WITH WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 10 OF 1999.
WITH
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 11 OF 1999.
The Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Mumbai City-V, Mumbai.
..Appellant.
vs.
Etak Corporation Ltd.
. ..Respondents.
Shri Ashok Kotngale i/b T.C. Kaushik for the appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 2.9. 2005.
P.C. : ----
. Learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue
states that the issue sought to be raised in the
present appeals is covered by the judgment of the
Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition
No.2334/1991 dated 12.8.2005 between Associated
Capsules Ltd vs. Prabhu Dayal & ors. In that view
of the matter, all these appeals are dismissed for
want of question of law.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the issue in the appeals is devoid of a question of law and covered by the judgment in Associated Capsules Ltd vs. Prabhu Dayal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Associated Capsules Ltd vs. Prabhu DayalReferred¶15
Writ Petition No.2334/1991 dated 12.8.2005 between Associated Capsules Ltd vs. Prabhu Dayal & ors
The Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Mumbai City-V
Etak Corporation Ltd.
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
