Disposed
Mulchand Kantilal Shah v. Swan Mills Ltd. and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/3406/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.509 OF 2005
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3406 OF 2004
W.P.No.509/05:
M/s.Swan Mills Ltd.
...Petitioner.
Vs.
Mulchand K.Shah....Respondent.
Mr.V.P.Vaidya for the Petitioner.
Mr.P.M.Patel for the Respondent.
W.P.No.3406/04:
Mulchand K.Shah.
...Petitioner.
Vs.
Swan Mills Ltd. & Anr.
...Respondents.
Mr.P.M.Patel for the Petitioner.
Mr.V.P.Vaidya for Respondent No.1.
March 2, 2005.
P.C. :
At the hearing of these two Petitions,
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the employer
and the workman are agreed that in full and final
settlement of the claim, dues and outstandings of
the workman (save and except the claim for interest
on delayed payment of gratuity), the employer shall
pay to the workman, a total amount of Rs.1,71,951/-
within a period of four weeks from today. This
shall, however, not preclude the workman from
availing of such remedies as he has in law, in
order to pursue his claim for interest on delayed
payment of gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity
Act, 1972. Since no other point has been pressed,
these petitions are accordingly disposed of in the
aforesaid terms.
M/s.Swan Mills Ltd.
Mulchand K.Shah
Swan Mills Ltd. & Anr.
O. O. C. J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court