The High Court at Bombay held that due to factual controversy, no relief could be granted under Article 226. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate legal remedies.
Relief denied; petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate legal remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No.3374 of 2005
Shri Prashant Hari Bhamare ..petitioner
vs
The President/Secretary Mah
Vidya Prasarak Mandal and ors... respondents
Ms Kumud A Bhatia for petitioner
Mr.C.R.Sonawane AGP for respondent State
Mr.S.M.Kamble for respondent nos.l and 2
CORAM: A.P.SHAH & D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ.
Dated 4.8.2005
P.C:
. Heard parties. Perused the affidavit filed on
behalf of the respondent no.2. Having regard to
the factual controversy raised in the petition, it
is not possible to grant any relief to the
petitioner in exercise of powers under Article 226.
Petition is therefore allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in accordance
with law.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to any relief in exercise of powers under Article 226 given the factual controversy.
Shri Prashant Hari Bhamare
The President/Secretary Mah Vidya Prasarak Mandal
respondent State
A.P. Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court