Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226. Due to factual controversy, relief was denied. Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in accordance with the law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No.l944 of 2005
Vashi Gao Gramastha Mandal & ors ..petitioners
vs
State of Mah and ors... respondents
Mr Ramesh Tripathi for petitioner
Mr.C.R.Sonawane AGP for respondent State
CORAM: A.P.SHAH & D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ.
Dated 4.8.2005
P.C:
. Heard parties. Perused the affidavit filed on
behalf of the respondent no.2. Having regard to
the factual controversy raised in the petition, it
is not possible to grant any relief to the
petitioner in exercise of powers under Article 226.
Petition is therefore allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in accordance
with law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vashi Gao Gramastha Mandal
State of Mah
A.P.SHAH
D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court