Petitioners furnished an undertaking to renew an expired bank guarantee. The Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition as pendency of an appeal persisted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3258 OF 1990.
Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. & anr. .. Petitioners.
V/s.
Union of India & ors.
.. Respondent.
Shri Shashi Jain with Ms NainaDesai for the petitiioners.
Mrs. S.V. Bharucha with Ms. N.V. Masurkar for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22.9.2005.
P.C. :
. Petitioners have furnished an undertaking to
renew bank guarantee as directed by this Court since the bank guarantee has expired during the pendency of the petition. Subject to the compliance of the said undertaking, petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition, in view of the pendency of their appeal. Petition is thus, dismissed as
withdrawn with no order as to costs.
. Undeertaking furnished taken on record.
All rival contentions are kept open.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.)
Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. & anr.
Union of India & ors.
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
