The High Court dismissed a central excise appeal in limine as no substantial question of law arose, dismissing it without costs.
Appeal dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.100 OF 2004
Commr. of Central Excise,Thane-II ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Tarapur Coating & Adhesives Ltd. ..Respondents.
Mr.P.S.Jetly with Y.R. Mishra i/b. Dr.T.C.Kaushik for
appellant.
Mr.M.H.Patil with Ms.Aparna Hindargi for respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the parties. No
substantial question of law arises in the appeal. The
appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to
costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Commr. of Central Excise
M/s.Tarapur Coating & Adhesives Ltd.
V.C. Daga
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court