The writ petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner at the hearing. No substantive order was made on the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3247 OF 1994
Shri Laxman Bapurao Veer
...Petitioner.
V/s
...Respondents.
----------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearnaces, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders
Court’s or Judge’s Orders.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
V. M. KANADE, JJ.
DATE : 17th August, 2005
P.C:
(R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.)
(V.M.KANADE, J.)
Shri Laxman Bapurao Veer
Special Land Acquisition Officer and others
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR
V. M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
