on the part of the petitioner, permission for repairs
was granted to the petitioner by the respondent No.1
by its letter dated 14th October, 1991 subject to the
certain terms and conditions incorporated in the said
letter. The petitioner, on his part, by the letter
dated 22nd October, 1991 objected for imposition of
one of the conditions relating to demolition of rear
portion of the said shed on the ground that the said
portion of the said shed being not unauthorised
structure. Meanwhile, the petitioner also carried out
the repairs to the said shed. However, the respondent
No.1 issued a stop work notice under Section 354-A of
the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, hereinafter
called as "the said Act", on 7th December, 1991 on the
ground that under the guise of carrying out the
repairs, pursuant to the permission granted to the
petitioner, he had been carrying out additions and
alterations to the said shed, which was refuted by the
petitioner under his letter dated 14th December, 1991.
The respondent No.1 thereafter carried out inspection
of the premises through its officers and subsequently
under the letter dated 19th December, 1991 withdrew
the notice issued under Section 354-A of the said Act.
After the completion of repair works, the petitioner
was served with the letter dated 10th December, 1993
alleging violation of the terms and conditions of the
