Disposed

Arun Dattatray Suryavanshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC2 Sept 2005WP/2601/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal writ petition, the High Court Bench held that since the charge-sheet was already filed in the underlying case, the remedy to quash the complaint was not maintainable. The court instead directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

What did the court decide?

The trial in Criminal Case No.19 of 2000 pending in JMFC, Jaisingpur was expedited to be disposed of within one year.

Arun Dattatray Suryavanshi Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2005)

¶1

:1:

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2601 OF 2004 Arun Dattatray Suryvanshi .. Petitioner Vs.

¶3

State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents

¶4

Mr. G.M. Savagave for Petitioner. Ms. P.H. Kantharia, APP for State.

¶5

CORAM: S.S. PARKAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ.

¶6

Date : September 02, 2005.

¶7

P.C.:

¶8

. This petition is filed challenging the F.I.R.

¶9

lodged	against	t	he		petit	ioner.		Th	ough	the
charge-sheet	was		filed	as	far	back	as	on		27/1/2000,
this	petition	came	to	be	filed	in	the	year	2004	for
quashing	the	com	plaint.		Since	the		charg	e-sheet	is
already	filed,	the	pet	itioner	can	go	for		any	other
remedy	that	may	be	availab	le to	him	und	er	the	law.
The	learned	Adv	ocate		appearing	fo	r	the		petitioner

¶10

states that since the complaint was filed in the year

¶11

1999, the trial of case may be expedited.

¶12

. The complaint which was registered under C.R. No.62 of 1999 has been given Criminal Case No.19 of

¶13

:2:

¶14

2000 after filing of the charge-sheet. It is necessary that the trial in the said case is expedited.

¶15

.	In the circumstances, the tria	l in Criminal
Case No.19	of 2000 pending	in the Court	of	JMFC,
Jaisingpur,	District Kolhapur,	is expedited	and	the
trial court is directed t	o dispose of the trial as far
as possible within a p	eriod of one year.

¶16

(S.S. Parkar,J.)

¶17

(Anoop V. Mohta,J.)

Arun Dattatray Suryavanshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Dattatray Suryavanshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaikwad Kishor Raghunath Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Janardan Parshuram Mhatre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Uday Vatsa Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Arun Dattatray Suryavanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Nandlal S.Wadhwa Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shantaram Waman Palekar Vs the State of Maharashtra