Nandlal S.Wadhwa v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
perm. to withdraw petitions granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 1034 TO 1045 OF 2004
AND
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 1048 TO 1058 OF 2004
Office Notes, Office ¦ Court’s or Memoranda of Coram, ¦ Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s ¦ orders or directions ¦ and Registrar’s orders. ¦
Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for Petitioner. Mr. D.R. More, APP for State in Cri.W.P. Nos.1034, 1035, 1043, 1048, 1049 of 2004. Ms. P.H. Kantharia, APP for State in Cri.W.P. Nos.1036, 1037, 1039, 1040, 1045, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1054, 1055 & 1056 of 2004. Mr. A.M. Shringarpure, APP for State in Cri.W.P.Nos. 1038, 1041, 1042 of 2004. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State in Cri.W.P.Nos. 1057 and 1058 of 2004. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for State in Cri.W.P.Nos. 1044 and 1053 of 2004. Mr. Subodh Desai for Respondent No.6 in all the matters.
Coram: S.S. Parkar & Anoop V. Mohta,JJ.
Date : 2/9/2005.
P.C.:
. The learned APP states that
| the | F.I.R. | has | been reg |
istered on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| the | basis of |
the | complaint | lodged |
| by the |
petitioner. | Mr. | Gorwadkar, | |
| appearing | for | the | petitioner, | |
| confirms this | by showing the | |||
| certified copy | of the F.I.R. |
. In view of the above,
Mr.Gorwadkar does not press these petitions as the same do not
survive and, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw them.
. Petitions are allowed to be
withdrawn.
(S.S. Parkar,J.)
(Anoop V. Mohta,J.)
Petitioner
State
Respondent No.6
S.S. Parkar
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court