Dismissed
Kamlakar Abudl Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/2513/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court rejected a writ petition challenging the refusal of furlough leave. The petitioner was convicted under sections 395, 396, and 397 of the IPC. Finding him not entitled under Rule 4(2) of the relevant Prisoner Leave Rules, the Court held no interference was warranted and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
The petition for writ of certioratus challenging the rejection of furlough leave was rejected, and the impugned order was affirmed.