Writ petition filed under PIL jurisdiction was filed by Sarthiseva. The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 1921 OF 2005
Sarthiseva and anr.
Petitioners
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Asif Ali Siddiquie for the petitioners.
Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent Nos. 1 to 3,.
Mr. M.M. Vashi for respondent No.4.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2005 .
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw this petition. Leave as prayed is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners would be at liberty to file the petition as and when it becomes imperative.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Sarthiseva and anr.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Dalveer Bhadari
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
