This is a one-line order granting an extension for the disposal of a petitioner's application for a video parlour licence, directing the respondent to decide within four weeks. No substantive dispute was addressed.
The respondent No.2 is directed to dispose of the petitioner's application within 4 weeks of the date of receipt of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1739 OF 2005
--------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
--------------------------------------------------------
Mr. N.P. Mishra for the
petitioner.
Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for the
State.
CORAM : S.S.PARKAR AND
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : 05.9.2005
. Though the petitioner had
applied for licence for running a
Video Parlour on 7/7/2005, the
same was not considered so far by
respondent No.2 and therefore,
this petition seeking directions
against the respondents. The
respondent No.2 is directed to
dispose of the application of the
petitioner within 4 weeks from
the date of the receipt of the
:2:
order by him. The petition shall
stand disposed of accordingly.
. Parties concernd to act
on a simple copy of this order,
duly authenticated by the
P.A./Sheristedar of this Court.
(S.S. PARKAR, J.)
(ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]
Petitioner
State
Respondent No.2
S.S. Parkar
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court