The petitioners conceded that their grievance no longer subsisted due to subsequent developments. The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous and discharged the rule.
Rule stands discharged with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1547 OF 1993
Shri Atmaram Dhondu Mahadik & Ors. .. Petitioners
Vs.
Municipal Corporation for
Greater Bombay & Ors. .. Respondents.
--
Shri Aditya Chitale for the petitioners.
Shri Chandnani i/b Gurusahani for the respondents.
--
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &
V.M.KANADE, JJ.
DATED : 16th AUGUST, 2005.
P.C.
1. The learned Advocate appearing for the
petitioners has fairly conceded that in view of the
subsequent development in the matter, after filing of
the petition, the grievance of the petitioners in the
petition no more subsists, and therefore, the petition
be disposed of as has been rendered infructuous.
2. The petition is accordingly disposed of as
having been rendered infructuous. Rule stands
discharged with no order as to costs.
(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J)
- 2 -
( V.M.KANADE, J)
Shri Atmaram Dhondu Mahadik & Ors.
Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay & Ors.
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
V.M.KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court