High Court disposed of a writ petition where no advocate appeared for the petitioner. The court held that prayers in abstract form could not be granted.
Writ Petition disposed of as prayers in abstract form cannot be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1504 of 1997
Mrs Saroj Prakash Mahadik & anr.. Petitioner
versus
State of Maharashtra & anr .. Respondents
None for petitioner
Mr.K.R.Belosay Assistant Government Pleader for the
respondents
CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ
DATED : 23rd November 2005.
P.C:-
Nobody appears for the petitioner.
2. Having perused the Writ Petition and the
prayers, we are of the view that prayers in abstract
form as prayed by the petitioner cannot be granted
in this Writ Petition.
3. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(R.M. LODHA, J)
Mrs Saroj Prakash Mahadik & anr.
State of Maharashtra & anr
R.M. LODHA
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court