The High Court of Bombay disposed of Appeal No. 585 of 2001 by accepting the consent terms filed by the appellant and respondent no. 1 regarding Writ Petition No. 2222 of 2000. No costs were awarded.
The appeal was disposed of in terms of consent terms filed by the appellant and respondent no. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 585 OF 2001
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2222 OF 2000
Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika .. Appellant
versus
Mr.V.B. Kalaskar & ors. .. Respondents
Mrs.R.N. Vora i/b M/s.Crawford Bayley & Co. for the
appellants.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ
DATED : 22nd November 2005.
P.C.:
On behalf of the appellant and respondent
no.1, consent terms have been filed. For
identification purposes, the said consent terms are
marked "X".
2. Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent
terms. The undertaking given by the respondent no.1
in paragraph no.5 is accepted.
3. No costs.
(R.M. LODHA, J)
(D.G. KARNIK, J)
Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika
Mr.V.B. Kalaskar
R.M. LODHA
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court