The High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition, holding that since alternate efficacious remedies were available to the petitioner, the petition did not merit interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1233 OF 2005
Smt. Vidya Appasaheb Wadkar..... ...... Petitioner. V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... ..... Respondents. Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. )
Mr.S.G. Deshmukh, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr.A.M. Shringarpure, APP for the State.
CORAM:V.G. PALSHIKAR
AND
R. C. CHAVAN, JJ.
20.7.2005.
PC:
Taking into consideration the nature of
dispute and the grievance made and the fact that alternate efficacious remedies are available
to the petitioner, petition is dismissed with liberty
to take on any of those remedies.
20.7.2005
Smt. Vidya Appasaheb Wadkar
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V.G. PALSHIKAR
R. C. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
